A Christmas Carol Review

There are many people who looked at the trailer for this and said “bah! Humbug!” I wasn’t a part of that crowd; I openly embraced the idea of re-imagining this classic Christmas story (hey, it beats running “A Christmas Story” for 24 hours on TBS on Christmas Day). I am also not a part of the crowd that believes that the performance-capture technology makes the characters look like soul-less zombies. I thought all the characters in “A Polar Express” and “Beowulf” looked fine and the attention to detail was off the charts. But I’m not saying that I didn’t have my concerns. Ever since they announced that Jim Carrey was cast as the three ghosts and Scrooge, I was excited but I was also thinking: “please don’t turn this into another Grinch”. And by that I mean the over-the-top and wacky Jim Carrey, as seen in “The Mask” and “Ace Ventura”. So went to see it today, and I walked out in love with this movie. I have seen the George C. Scott version, the Muppets version, and the Disney version, but I consider Robert Zemeckis’ version to be the best. It has everything that the other versions were missing and more.

The tale is timeless. It revolves around a selfish, grouchy old man named Ebenezer Scrooge who hates Christmas and pretty much anything jolly. But one Christmas Eve, he’s visited by three ghosts that are to help him realize the error of his ways and help him become a better man.

Many have complained about the fact that this film is way too frightening for small children, but what many of those people don’t realize is that “A Christmas Carol” was not written to be a Christmas tale, it was actually written as a horror story. What’s so great about this version is that Zemeckis nails bringing the horror elements to life, but he still manages to tug at your heartstrings with the Tiny Tim situation. Also, a lot of the story’s famous scenes are presented in a whole new way through stunning CG and some of the best usage of IMAX 3-D I have ever seen. Some of the scenes in this film are jaw-dropping, such as when Scrooge meets the Ghost of Christmas Present. Scrooge walks in the room and he enters a giant, lavish room decorated with Christmas items and the room sparkles with gold, green, and red. I was stunned beyond my wildest dreams, because I was not prepared for such a breathtaking sight. There are also rollercoaster ride scenes in the film that are actually quite amazing and don’t distract you from the original story. One of those rollercoaster ride scenes is when the Ghost of Christmas Past flies Scrooge through a snow covered forest and the city of London at night. Both scenes make you feel like you’re being lifted out of your chair and your soaring around the theater (especially in IMAX).

But on the other hand, the horror elements of the story are present and are quite frightening to watch. There are moments where I jumped out my seat, and ones where I felt really, really creeped out. There was a 5 year old boy with his father sitting next to me and during one frightening scene towards the end, they left the movie. “A Christmas Carol” is rated PG for scary sequences and images, and therefore many 1-6 year olds will not be able to handle this movie. I’m not insulting your kids, but there are some scenes in this film are pretty fucking disturbing. And if you see it in IMAX, it will probably be twice as frightening (since I saw it in both regular and IMAX presentation). Many people will read this and say: “it’s A Christmas Carol. It is appropriate for my 4 year old. How bad can it be?” For your four year-old, pretty bad.

Another great feature of the performance capture is the transformation of the actors. Jim Carrey is absolutely amazing as Scrooge and the three ghosts. With Scrooge, Carrey uses Scrooge’s physicality to his full advantage. He lurches forward, creepily moves his fingers, and talks in a bitter fashion. You forget it is Jim Carrey after 30 seconds. He also plays the three ghosts brilliantly, especially the Ghost of Christmas Present. Gary Oldman also does an incredible job as Bob Cratchit and the ghost of Jacob Marley.

Now, there is one particular scene from the film that I did not like. When the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come chases after Scrooge, Scrooge is shrunken and then has the squeaky voice. That scene is played for laughs but I did not care for it. I felt it was unnecessary and it just wasn’t that funny.

Overall, “A Christmas Carol” delivers on everything I wanted from the film and it gives me a new sense of appreciation for the classic tale. The performance capture technology and the IMAX 3-D make a great combination, and it takes you on the ride of a lifetime. Although it’s not for the little ones, this movie will delight both older kids and adults. And people, see it in IMAX. This is one of those films that needs to be seen in that format. A

The Invention of Lying Review

I love people that take chances and try something new. Without people like that, the film industry would suck. If filmmakers just played it safe, some of the greatest films ever made would never exist. It’s a bold move to roll the filmmaking dice and see what your new ideas get you. Unfortunately, “The Invention of Lying” craps out. This never looked like a good movie to me. Every time I saw the trailer, I thought it looked boring and unfunny. And now I feel the exact same way after actually seeing it. I admire its fearless ambition to try something new, but the pay-off really sucks.

The plot of this film involves an alternate reality where everybody tells the truth, and nobody ever speaks a lie. For example, if you’re on a date, the girl will tell you that your suit is gay and your breath stinks. And when she breaks up with you, she will say “it’s not me, it’s you”. But a writer named Mark Bellison (Ricky Gervais) tells the world’s first lie and learns how to lie to use it for his own personal gain. To many people, that would sound like a very interesting and intriguing plot, but to me it sounds completely uninteresting. That’s exactly what I found this movie to be: boring and uninteresting. I did not care at all what was going to happen. And even though I had never seen a plot like that before, it didn’t engage me at all.

Ricky Gervais is a very talented guy. I (personally) am not a big fan of British comedy. I don’t get most of the humor and it just doesn’t strike me as funny. I have seen one of Gervais’ stand-up shows and I thought he was actually very funny. He is the best part of this movie. Even though I didn’t care what was going to happen plot-wise, it was always very amusing playing this character that learns how to lie. But besides Ricky Gervais (and an appearance by Fionnula Flanagan), the acting in this movie is terrible. I thought Jennifer Garner was very boring. She acts like she has no emotions and you see the look on her face that tells you she’s only in it for the check. After “13 Going on 30” (one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen), “Catch and Release”, and “Ghosts of Girlfriends Past”, she should just stop doing these light-hearted comedies. She was a bad-ass motherfucker in “Alias”. Please God, do something like that again!

The script is also very unoriginal, because most of the jokes and sub-plots fell flat. Even if I wasn’t going to be blown away by the plot, I just wanted some jokes to ease my appetite. There are a ton of scenes where they could’ve had some great jokes, but those opportunities were destroyed by the moronic script and the dreadful execution of some of the scenes, especially those with Jennifer Garner. On the brighter side, there are a couple of moments that out a genuine smile on my face and I felt like I was enjoying myself. But there are very few of those moments.

Overall, “The Invention of Lying” is a very boring film that has little entertainment, and lots of unnecessary story. Seeing this at the theater is a waste of your money but if you really want to see it, wait for it to show on cable. C-

Jennifer's Body Review

SORRY FOR MY REVIEW BEING SO LATE. I MUST BE HONEST, I’VE BEEN VERY BUSY LATELY AND HAVEN’T HAD THAT MUCH TIME TO WATCH MOVIES. I MANAGED TO SEE THIS FILM LAST WEEKEND BUT I DIDN’T HAVE TIME TO WRITE MY REVIEW. SO NOW THAT I’VE HAD SOME SPARE TIME, HERE’S MY REVIEW FOR “JENNIFER’S BODY”.

To the all people going into this movie hoping to see Megan Fox naked, I must deliver some very disappointing news. There is absolutely no nudity in this film. Not from Megan Fox; not from Amanda Seyfried; not from anybody. That’s also one of the reasons why my grade for “Jennifer’s Body” is lower than it could’ve been. No I’m not a pervert, but when the filmmakers promised nudity and went back on their promise, that was just mean. So sorry guys, no Megan Fox nudity, but this would’ve been the perfect movie for some too. Then again even without the anticipated nudity, “Jennifer’s Body” actually turns out to be good entertainment. This film was written by Diablo Cody who won an Oscar for her screenplay for “Juno” 2 years ago. While “Juno” is a far superior film, “Jennifer’s Body” is funny, creepy, and devilishly sexy.

As seen in the trailer, the film revolves around Jennifer (Megan Fox) being possessed by a demon who then goes off seducing and killing boys. One of the best things about the film is the fucked-up friendship between the two main characters, Jennifer and Needy (played by “Big Love’s” Amanda Seyfried). They are complete opposites, yet you the sense that they are incomplete without each other. Needy being the nerd and Jennifer being the bitch, the two characters play off of each other and those scenes are even better when you have good dialogue. Hats off to Diablo Body for creating some truly original and funny dialogue.

Now individually, Seyfried is the better actress. She already proved she can act with her great performance on “Big Love”, and she delivers a hilarious performance. She is extraordinarily convincing and she brings out the emotions and uses them full charge. Megan Fox on the other can’t do shit without Seyfried by her side. She sucks at acting and like I’ve said before: if it weren’t for her looks, she would not have a career. She displays no enthusiasm or emotion when reading a single line and I felt no sympathy for her when she goes through some seriously ugly shit.

There is also a decent supporting cast in the film, with the highlight being J.K. Simmons. He is a great actor whose screen presence always brightens my day. He is a truly charming man with a sweet undertone and is hilarious at the same time. The same cannot be said for Adam Brody and Johnny Simmons. I have heard a lot of positive reaction to Brody’s performance, but I thought he was just as bland as Megan Fox and he was painful to listen to. Johnny Simmons is also boring to watch. When we are supposed to laugh for him and feel sorry for him, I wanted to beat his face in with a crow bar.

The film also has some truly stunning special effects. When Jennifer turns into a demon, I almost jumped out of my seat. Surprisingly, there are also some really cool kills in this film and a good amount of gore. On the very negative side of the film, the soundtrack is very annoying and tedious. Even with one great song (one by Panic! At the Disco), most of the songs all sounded the same and are truly unoriginal. The soundtrack kills the horror film vibe and it makes it even more obvious that “Jennifer’s Body” is another one of those hipster films.

Overall, “Jennifer’s Body” is good fun. While it is very disappointing that there is no nudity, there are enough laughs and thrills to justify the matinee price. B-

9 Review

Anticipation can be such a pain in the ass sometimes. Sometimes it pays off (“The Dark Knight”), and other times it just destroys you (“Public Enemies”). Now when anticipating a film based on the trailer, there are two things that the movie can be. First, it could be a really bad movie with all the decent parts being shown in the trailer. On the other hand, the trailer can just be a tiny preview of the enormous entertainment that the film has. The trailer for “9” is mind-blowing, featuring some truly bad-ass shots and a great song to go with the trailer (“Welcome Home” by Coheed & Cambria; seriously get this song on your iPod). Unfortunately, this is one of the times where the trailer is much better than the movie itself. “9” isn’t terrible, but it’s not good either. The simple story is really stretched out and the characters are extraordinarily underdeveloped. But, it is also a gorgeous-looking movie with breathtaking animation and some big “holy shit” moments.

The story is very simple: nine living rag dolls fight against Terminator-like machines that have destroyed all humanity. That’s it. I’m not kidding, there is nothing else. For a movie that could’ve had a very complex and intriguing story is replaced by a very simple and predictable one. There have many complaints about the runtime of this movie (it’s 80 minutes), and I’m one of the complainers. We get no time for character development or thoughtful insight on the war, or the rag dolls, or even the machines. I would’ve loved to seen more machines than they had in the film, and the coolest looking machine only has a 5-10 minute appearance. I felt absolutely nothing for these characters and I really didn’t care what was going to happen after I knew the whole story. I pretty much predicted who was going to die and what was going to happen, and they even show one major death in the trailer.

The film feels like its building up to this stunning finale and it’s going to blow me away. The sad part is it ended in such a boring and uncreative way. At the end of the film, my friend and I literally said at the same time: “that’s it? Don’t tell me that’s the end.” As for running time, many people have already criticized me about that saying that a short film can be a very good one. I think “The Nightmare Before Christmas” is shorter than “9”, but when I watch “The Nightmare Before Christmas” I actually feel extremely entertained and it doesn’t have any moments where something just falls flat. But also, “The Nightmare Before Christmas” feels like a 2 hour movie to me, but “9” felt like it was 45 minutes. Another big problem I have with the film is that the chain of events is started by the stupidest thing. I won’t spoil it, but it really does cheapen the story even more.

On the positive side, this film is stunning to look at. The animation is incredible and the attention to littlest details is off the charts. The world that the director has created is great and it feels alive and genuine. The character designs are also dead-on beautiful and machines are very creative (despite there being so few of them). I honestly couldn’t have cared less who voiced the characters, but they all did a really good job. Christopher Plummer gives another great voice performance (he was also Charles Muntz in “Up”), and so does Elijah Wood. Oh, so does John C. Reily, Martin Landau, and Jennifer Connelly. The film also some very good “holy shit” moments, such as one really disturbing image seen when 9 first wakes up and goes exploring.

One word warning: take the PG-13 seriously. This film is far more violent and intense than most of the animated films being released these days. There are some pretty disturbing images and scenes, and the machines (including my favorite one) will scare the hell out of younger kids.

Overall, “9” is a beautifully animated movie that is far too simple and criminally underdeveloped. They could’ve had so much more depth and story, but the movie is simple to a fault. I don’t recommend you pay to see this in the theater, but see this when it comes out on DVD or plays at a $1 theater. C

All About Steve Review

For all of you people that loved “The Proposal” and said that Sandra Bullock still had that magic comedic tough, I have one thing to say to you: you were wrong motherfuckers. Absolutely, horrifyingly, positively wrong. There is only one way I can describe Sandra Bullock’s character in this film: she is Jar-Jar Binks, times a thousand. I’d rather listen to a Jar-Jar Binks comedy routine than ever hear a single syllable come out of Sandra Bullock’s character’s mouth ever again. I am mad as hell that I saw this movie. I don’t want to write a long review about it, so I’m just going to keep this short. Do not pay a single goddamn penny for this movie. If you’re smart enough to listen to me, you will have avoided wasting precious time and money. Don’t even go to a free screening, and you will have saved yourself seven months of mental restoration. “All About Steve” gets TWO GIANT MIDDLE FINGERS UP! It’s almost the worst movie of the year, but it’s still a fucking mess. Fuck this movie. I want it to be locked up and thrown into the ocean where I never have to hear about it again. F

The Final Destination Review

When describing “The Final Destination”, I will only use two words: unnecessary bullshit. This film has no reason to exist other than to make us watch (once again) a group of stupid teenagers get brutally killed in some of most unique and totally unrealistic ways. This film is goddamn awful. It is horribly flawed on so many levels. The dialogue is crap, the acting sucks, and the 3-D is completely unnecessary. But, at the same time, I cannot (and will not) deny that I experienced a sick sense of joy watching these retarded teenagers get massacred by everyday objects. On that level of the creativity of the deaths, this film works really well.

Let’s just get one thing out of the way: this is a terrible movie. The dialogue feels really forced and has zero creativity in it. The dialogue is just there to move the movie from one gory death to another. If they had made this movie dialogue-free, I would’ve loved it. But, the dialogue is also at another level o bad when you have some of the worst actors reading it. Nobody in this movie gives a good performance, and you feel no sympathy for any of these people when they either get crushed, mauled, burned, blown up, decapitated, drowned, and many other ways of death.

On the other hand, the death scenes are so fun to watch. When character that has annoyed through-out the whole movie experiences a horrible, gory death, you’re going to forget all the serious flaws that this movie has. The deaths keep getting better and better with each movie, and here it’s just awesome watching somebody die. My favorite scene out of this whole movie is one that involves an escalator, but I won’t spoil it.

Overall, “The Final Destination” is one of the biggest guilty pleasures I have ever seen. It’s horribly flawed, but the death scenes make you forget about those flaws. If you’re going into this expecting a good story, great characters, and solid writers, this ain’t your movie. But if you’re one of those people that love watching gory effects and annoying characters get destroyed to a gory pulp, this is your movie. C+

Inglourious Basterds Review

For the past 20 years, Quentin Tarantino has made some the weirdest, most violent, and f-bomb filled films I have ever seen. He has a directing and writing style that is unique, and he adds zest and flavor to each of his films; from “Reservoir Dogs”, to “Pulp Fiction”, the “Kill Bill” movies, and now “Inglourious Basterds”. But, he hasn’t made a great Quentin Tarantino movie since “Pulp Fiction”. He’s made very good movies that have a unique style, but most of them don’t feel like a Quentin Tarantino movie. But, with “Inglourious Basterds”, Tarantino has finally made another great movie. It has smart, snappy dialogue, lots of blood and gore, strong language, and quirky characters. It might not be as good as “Pulp Fiction”, but it’s still one hell of a ride.

“Inglourious Basterds” (like most Tarantino movies) consists of interwoven storylines. One storyline involves a Jewish woman who (years before) witnessed the slaughter of her entire family at the hands of the Nazi officer Col. Hans Landa (played by Christoph Waltz), and now plans revenge on the Nazis the killed her family. Another storyline involves the Basterds, a group of guerilla soldiers led by Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt), who go around brutally killing and scalping Nazis. The storylines here are very well-developed and very entertaining, but the weakest one is the one with the Jewish woman hell-bent on revenge. Her storyline is interesting, but no where near as engaging and fun to watch as the storyline involving the Basterds. These guys are awesome, and with a universally excellent cast, you feel a real connection with these guys even if what they are doing seems animal-like to you.

When I said “Inglourious Basterds” features an excellent cast , I’m not kidding. I still may not be able to forgive Paul Rust for being in “I Love You, Beth Cooper”, but he’s very good here. The three greatest performances I think are by: Brad Pitt, Christoph Waltz, and voice-over performance from Samuel L. Jackson. Brad Pitt with his hilarious accent feels like a genuine anti-hero and you root for this guy till the very end. Brad Pitt makes him charismatic, charming, and downright psychotic, and gives one of his best performances in years. Christoph Waltz also gives a great performance, and deserves a Best Supporting Actor nomination. Like Brad Pitt, he is charming, venomous, and downright brilliant. He may be an evil son of a bitch in the movie, but I would have dinner with this guy. He may kill me, but it’d be worth it. The supporting cast is also very good including Eli Roth, Diane Kruger, Mike Myers (yes, the Austin Powers Mike Myers), and Melanie Laurent.

One serious word of warning, this is a really violent movie. Even coming from Quentin Tarantino, some of the scenes in this film are shockingly gory and feature some very gruesome images. While it doesn’t even have one-tenth of the f-bombs that “Pulp Fiction” had, the violence makes this another hard-R Tarantino movie. Parents use extreme caution.

There are some problems with this movie. The biggest problem is that it’s way too long, and it doesn’t help that some of the scenes drag on long after I’m satisfied with them. At 149 minutes, it can get boring, but if it were 120 minutes, this would’ve been a much better movie. Another big problem I had with the film was some of the dialogue. While most of it is very, very good, I felt some pieces of dialogue to awkward and out of place. Tarantino also makes so many references to other movies in this film, and they don’t help the film. They just feel even more out of place. Also, there’s a subplot involving Diane Kruger that I felt wasn’t necessary. As gorgeous as she is and as great of a performance she delivers, the subplot felt hollow and (once again) out of place. For those expecting a realistic portrayal of an alternate reality with deep moral issues and realistic action, you’re completely fucked. Like the Kill Bill movies, it’s not very realistic and it’s really over-the-top.

Overall, “Inglourious Basterds” is another strong addition to great movie month of August 2009. It’s gritty, over-the-top, and a lot of fun to watch. While it does have its issues, I had a great time and for my money, that’s all I want. A-

The Time Traveler's Wife Review

To be honest, “The Time Traveler’s Wife” is so much better than what it seems like in the trailer, but to me, that’s still not really saying a lot. From I saw in the trailer, this film looked absolutely retarded; another boring, melodramatic romance. Plus, having Eric Bana as your leading man doesn’t really help the situation for me, because the last he was the lead in a romance movie (“Lucky You”), that film bombed. This film reminds of “The Notebook”, which ironically also stars Rachel McAdams. Both movies are about two lovers that are destined to be together, but certain circumstances occur where they can’t be together, or are together a short period of time. If “The Notebook” and “Slaughterhouse-Five” had a child, “The Time Traveler’s Wife” would be their baby. It has the true love aspect of “The Notebook” and the random time-traveling craziness of “Slaughterhouse-Five”. But in this case, the parents are better than the kid. “The Time Traveler’s Wife” is sweet and heartfelt at times, but the other times it’s very melodramatic and downright ridiculous.

I can hear my friends that are girls saying: Ridiculous? But, Adam, it’s a story about how love conquers all. It’s so sweet.

Yes, it has its sweet moments. I just said that. But I also said that after those sweet are over with, I’m stuck with melodramatic crap for another twenty minutes. After watching Eric Bana’s character trying to figure out where the hell he is for the fiftieth time, it starts to get on my nerves.

Okay, this movie is about a guy named Henry DeTamble (Eric Bana) who’s born with a disease that causes him to travel time when he is stressed. He can’t control where or when he’ll go. He also meets a girl named Claire (Rachel McAdams) whom he falls in love with. They go through the normal marriage phases: first-time sex, marriage, kids, miscarriages, arguments, make-ups, deaths, and so on and so forth. The problem with their marriage is that he time-travels (a lot), and she has to wait for him to return for very long stretches of time.

I’ve been hearing a lot of complaints that say that this film has a very complicated and confusing story. To me, this movie was as easy to understand as “Green Eggs and Ham”. If you can watch “Lost” and know what the hell is going on, you’ll be alright following the story in this movie. Probably the scene that I liked the most happens towards the end. It’s very sad, and I almost cried. It wasn’t a “Wall-E” or “Up” moment, but it was very sad. And another thing I liked about this movie that every time I felt something for these characters, it didn’t feeling I was being manipulated. I felt a sincere connection to some of these characters. For us guys that aren’t really keen to these romance movies, there will be a couple of moments where you will laugh and crack jokes. There is one scene that had me cracking up, and it wasn’t intentional. It was the scene where a 40 year old Henry meets a 6 year old Claire. It might’ve been sweet in the book, but it looks like he going to molest her in the movie. The film has its unintentionally funny moments, so be warned.

One thing that terrible in this movie was the acting. Every time somebody opened their mouths to say something, it seemed like they didn’t give a shit what was going on at the moment. Eric Bana has been good (“Munich”), but he’s just bad here. He almost has one note through-out the entire film, and he kills some of the more serious scenes. I love Rachel McAdams. I’ve always admired her, but she gives one of her worst performances here. She talks in this annoying raspy voice throughout the movie, and it got on my nerves (especially when she and Bana are yelling at each other). She doesn’t do it all the time, but it’s painful when she uses that voice.

Overall, “The Time Traveler’s Wife” is a surprisingly decent movie, but it’s far from great. If you have one in your town, go see this movie at a $1 theater. If this film didn’t have some of those sweet moments, I would’ve given this a much lower grade. But since those sweet moments are present in this film, I like this movie a little bit more than I thought I would. B-

Ponyo Review

Released in North America simply as “Ponyo”.

2009 has been a great year for animation, and “Ponyo” continues that streak of great animated films. Hayao Miyazaki has created another fantastic movie that proves animated films are just as good as many of those undeserved Best Picture nominees. With a good story (if not slightly familiar a la “The Little Mermaid”), a very talented voice-acting cast, and beautiful animation, “Ponyo” will delight and bewitch kids and adults alike. Still, there are some minor problems with “Ponyo” that keep it from being another Miyazaki masterpiece, like “Princess Mononoke” and “Spirited Away”.

The biggest surprise for me about “Ponyo” is that the voice-cast is actually prefect. I was very worried that Disney had hired Noah Cyrus and Frankie Jonas to promote Hannah Montana and the Jonas Brothers, but they knew what they were doing when they cast these two young, talented actors to play the leading roles. Their voices fit their characters perfectly and they bring to characters to life with such personality and charisma. Not that many great actors take voice-acting seriously, but all of the adult actors voicing supporting characters are incredible. Liam Neeson (on a streak of great performances) and Cate Blanchett have fantastic screen presence as Ponyo’s parents, and their characters are animated perfectly to fit their booming and commanding voices. Tina Fey also gives a very sweet performance as Sosuke’s mom. Bravo all around for the incredible voice talents.

Once again, the animation in this film is gorgeous. The animators alone deserve Academy Awards. The character animations are incredibly detailed and fit their voices perfectly. Another thing I thought that was animated gorgeously was the ocean. Sometimes animators are lazy when designing an ocean in an animated film by saying “it’s just a damn ocean”. That damn ocean is a big part of this movie, and they succeeded in making the ocean look beautiful and breath-taking. In fact, it looked gorgeous I wanted to jump into the movie just to take a swim in that ocean. There’s also one scene where the ocean goes complete berserk with sea life erupting out and waves crashing everywhere, and it’s a sight to behold. The amount of strenuous hours these animators have put in has totally paid off.

Now here’s the section where the problems come into view. Even though Miyazaki is an extraordinarily gifted story-teller, sometimes he can tell too much story. There’s one subplot in this film that did not work for me at all and didn’t feel right being in this film. I won’t spoil it, but if Miyazaki had removed it from the film, the film would’ve a lot more fluent. Not that it’s terrible subplot (it’s a very good one), but it’s just not developed enough for it to be included in this film. But besides that one subplot, the story here is magnificent.

Overall, “Ponyo” is another great film from Hayao Miyazaki. Even though it’s not one of his masterpieces, it’s still a wonderful movie worth checking out. It’s one of the best animated films of the year, and one of my favorite movies released this year. A

District 9 Review

Every now and then, a film of a certain genre comes along that completely changes the game. The game is science-fiction, and that film is “District 9”. Unlike “The Dark Knight”, this amazing film came out of nowhere. The first glimpse of this film we got was a poster that read “You Are Not Welcome Here”, followed by the title. But the only familiar name we get from the film is Peter Jackson, who produced the film. “District 9” is a fantastic movie that is a shining star in a summer filled with mind-less crap (I’m looking at you “Transformers”), and it’s one of the most enjoyable sci-fi films I’ve seen in a long time. Filled with great suspense, originality, and mind-blowing action, “District 9” is one of the best films I’ve seen all year.

“District 9” begins with some alien refugees from a foreign planet arriving on Earth. They are taken to a section of South Africa called District 9, and put under the watchful (if uninterested) eye of a company called Multi-National United (MNU). The real story kicks off when a member of MNU contracts an alien virus that rapidly changes his DNA, and now must flee from the MNU and seek refuge inside District 9. The story breaks free from all the usual sci-fi film clichés and comes up with a brilliant and original story that fascinated me from beginning to end. I rarely mention the ending of a film, but the ending to “District 9” is awe-inspiring. I never would’ve guessed in a million years it would end that.

The real highlight of “District 9” is the visual effects. They are stunning, to say the least, and they always convinced me that I was looking at something real and genuine. From the spaceships to the aliens themselves, the effects have amazing depth and texture. I felt like I could reach out and touch the screen, and I would be able to feel the alien’s skin. The sound design in this film is brilliant as well. When those action scenes happened, that theater shook with the might of action. I felt my heart pounding with the music while the film was going on. I stood on the edge of my seat during one particular scene towards the end, and you’ll know which scene I mean when you see it.

For a directorial debut, Neill Blomkamp, with this movie, has established himself as one of the best directors of his generation. He directs this film with a mighty eye for detail and he makes (almost) every second of this film count. Plus, he edits this film in such a beautiful way that whatever great tension and suspense was there already, we get even more. They also did a fantastic job with the casting of the film. The new kid on the block, Sharlto Copley, gives an astounding performance as the lead character. He summons every powerful emotion from his body and uses them in some of the best scenes of the movie, and his acting makes those scenes even better.

Now, notice how I said “almost” in the previous paragraph? The only complaint I have about this film, is that I wish that they had made the film longer. If they had gone the full two hours, this film would’ve been a complete masterpiece, but like “The Hurt Locker” it’s not quite there.

Overall, “District 9” is a triumph of pure entertainment and a thrill-ride for those escaping some of the weaker releases this weekend. A